Contact
  1. Home
  2. Our approach

Approach

Our approach

Rigorously efficient administration is achievable by any company.
It is the starting point that determines whether an overseas business succeeds.

Issue

The barrier to overseas expansion is a lack of talent

In many Japanese companies, employees with no knowledge of or experience in overseas business are put in charge of it and are struggling to find their way by trial and error, with little idea of where to start. Public surveys also point to a shortage of people to drive overseas expansion.

  • 85.2%

    Companies whose staffing for overseas business is “insufficient or not secured”

    JETRO (FY2025)1

  • No. 1

    53.1%

    Reason for not having expanded overseas: “No suitable personnel”

    Japan Finance Corporation Research Institute (2023)2

  • Tied No. 1

    32.9%

    Challenge in overseas expansion: “No personnel able to handle overseas business”

    SME SUPPORT JAPAN (2024)3

Sources

  1. JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization), FY2025 JETRO Survey on the International Operations of Japanese Firms, preliminary results (「2025年度 ジェトロ海外ビジネス調査(日本企業の海外事業展開に関するアンケート調査)」速報版; February 2026; 3,369 valid responses), p. 31. Total of “partly insufficient” (46.0%), “significantly insufficient” (20.3%) and “unable to secure / have not secured” (18.9%) among responses on the staffing level for overseas business (n=3,063). In Japanese:
    https://www.jetro.go.jp/news/releases/2026/fb2468413e5d19f0.html
  2. Japan Finance Corporation Research Institute, Survey on Overseas Expansion and Reshoring of SMEs (「中小企業の海外展開と国内回帰に関する調査」; June 2023; 3,790 valid responses), Figure 7. Multiple responses from companies planning or interested in overseas expansion (n=354). In Japanese:
    https://www.jfc.go.jp/n/findings/pdf/tokubetu_230601_2.pdf
  3. Organization for Small & Medium Enterprises and Regional Innovation, JAPAN (SME SUPPORT JAPAN), Survey on Overseas Expansion of SMEs (2024): Questionnaire Survey Report (「中小企業の海外展開に関する調査(2024年)アンケート調査報告書」; March 2024), Figure 13 (n=310, multiple responses; tied for first with “exchange rate risk”). In Japanese:
    https://www.smrj.go.jp/research_case/questionnaire/fbrion0000002pjw-att/kaigaitenkai_202403_2_report_C1.pdf

Winning pattern

Winning patterns in overseas business

Companies that succeed overseas broadly excel in at least one of the following three areas.

Product & service competitiveness / Brand & capital strength

These take a long time and considerable cost to build. Gaps are hard to close quickly in overseas markets, and strengths built up in Japan may not carry over as they are.

Rigorously efficient administration

Achievable, in principle, by any company. With people and systems well versed in overseas business, this can be achieved reliably and at low cost, and it is the starting point that determines whether an overseas business succeeds.

Structure

Comparing administrative structures for overseas business

Who handles administration makes a large difference to the headcount, cost and risk involved.

Area Handled by each head-office department Handled by a local administration department Blanket delegation
to the local head
RecommendedEngaging an overseas
administration specialist
Finance1 person1 person1 local head1 specialist
Accounting1 person1 person
Tax1 person1 person
Legal1 person1 person
General affairs1 person1 person
HR & labor1 person1 person
Headcount required6 people6 people1 person1 (outside expert)
Issues and featuresLacks knowledge of the country and struggles to cope. Tends to defer to whatever outside advisors sayNot enough work to justify hiring dedicated administrative staffFew suitable candidates, and salaries are very high even when one can be hired. Fraud risk is also highCovers overseas business across functions. Low-cost operation with limited fixed costs
  • Handled by each head-office department

    Staffing
    1 person each for finance, accounting, tax, legal, general affairs and HR & labor
    Headcount required
    6 people

    Lacks knowledge of the country and struggles to cope. Tends to defer to whatever outside advisors say

  • Handled by a local administration department

    Staffing
    1 person each for finance, accounting, tax, legal, general affairs and HR & labor
    Headcount required
    6 people

    Not enough work to justify hiring dedicated administrative staff

  • Blanket delegation to the local head

    Staffing
    1 local head
    Headcount required
    1 person

    Few suitable candidates, and salaries are very high even when one can be hired. Fraud risk is also high

  • Engaging an overseas administration specialistRecommended

    Staffing
    1 specialist
    Headcount required
    1 (outside expert)

    Covers overseas business across functions. Low-cost operation with limited fixed costs

People

For overseas roles, using outside experts
makes more sense than full-time hiring

A dedicated full-time employee is often more than is needed when entering one or two countries, and using outside experts also suits the way overseas business works, which depends on close cooperation with local professionals and partners.

Hiring a full-time employee
VS
Using outside expertsRecommended
Hiring a full-time employee

Not enough work for a dedicated position

Entering one or two countries does not generate enough work for a dedicated hire, so staffing tends to exceed what is needed

Workload
Using outside experts

Delegate only what you need

The scope of involvement can be designed around the number of countries and the stage of the business, with no excess headcount

Hiring a full-time employee

Internal staff alone cannot do it all

Overseas, outside professionals and partners are essential. Having an employee does not eliminate external spending

Outside resources
Using outside experts

Makes full use of outside professionals and partners

A single point of coordination with local lawyers, accounting firms and partners, making the most of outside expertise

Hiring a full-time employee

Employment is strongly protected under Japanese law

Dismissal requires objectively reasonable grounds and must be appropriate in light of socially accepted norms (Article 16 of Japan’s Labor Contract Act). Reducing headcount is difficult even on exit

Flexibility
Using outside experts

Can be adjusted as circumstances change

The scope of the contract can be expanded, reduced or ended as the business progresses, and you can start small

Hiring a full-time employee

Very few suitable candidates

Few people on the market can handle overseas business across functions, so recruitment itself often stalls

Securing talent
Using outside experts

Access to a broad skill set

Draw on cross-functional expertise, from accounting, tax, legal and HR to sales, that is hard to secure through full-time hiring

Hiring a full-time employee

High pay becomes a fixed cost

Competition for talent tends to drive pay up

Cost
Using outside experts

Turns fixed costs into variable costs

Fees reflect workload and duration, with no ancillary costs such as social insurance contributions

Contact

Contact

Whether you are launching overseas operations, reviewing your administrative structure or considering an exit, please feel free to get in touch.

Contact us